Overblog
Suivre ce blog
Editer l'article Administration Créer mon blog
Le blog de fukushima-is-still-news

Le blog de fukushima-is-still-news

information about Fukushima published in English in Japanese media info publiée en anglais dans la presse japonaise

Who should run Monju reactor?

December 28, 2015

Panel holds first meeting on finding new Monju reactor operator

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2015/12/28/national/panel-holds-first-meeting-finding-new-monju-reactor-operator/#.VoEQQFIR-ic

 

Kyodo

A government panel held its first meeting Monday to find a new operator for the Monju prototype fast-breeder reactor, as recommended by the National Regulation Authority.

The panel, set up by the education and science ministry, aims to conclude discussions and report its decision to the NRA within six months.

“We will make a decision on a new operator based on (the panel members’) expert knowledge,” education and science minister Hiroshi Hase said at the beginning of the meeting.

The NRA recommended in November that the minister pick a new entity to take charge of trouble-prone Monju, as it sees little progress in safety management under the current operator, the government-backed Japan Atomic Energy Agency.

The head of the NRA urged Hase to consider measures to ensure the reactor’s safety, including closing it if a replacement entity can’t be found within six months.

The government has been trying to develop a commercial fast-breeder reactor that can produce more plutonium than it consumes in a bid to recycle nuclear fuel in the future. Plutonium can be used as nuclear fuel by mixing it with uranium.

The government has spent more than ¥1 trillion on the project, but Monju’s repeated safety problems have left it idle much of the time since it first achieved criticality in 1994.

Industry observers said it will be hard to find a successor to operate the reactor, as it generates electricity in a more complex way than light-water reactors that utilities run at present.

Monju’s closure could lead to a drastic review of a nuclear policy the government has pursued for decades.

Akito Arima, the chief of the eight-member panel, said after the meeting that he doesn’t have a clear outlook at present for who could be a successor.

A former president of the University of Tokyo and education minister, Arima said he won’t rule out the possibility of shutting down the reactor. But he added that “the chance is low” as he believes engineers’ knowledge of such an advanced reactor and the large-scale investment to date should be put to maximum use.

During the meeting, the education and science ministry proposed main points of discussion, such as technology needed to run the project and how safety should be managed.

The panel members include scholars and those engaged in the nuclear power business.

Hase said after the meeting he is considering adding or changing members of the panel as discussions advance.

The  ministry initially planned to hold the first meeting by mid-December, but it took longer than planned to form the panel as some people declined to serve on it.

 

 

Panel to study who should run fast-breeder reactor

http://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/english/news/nuclear.html

 

Dec. 28, 2015 - Updated 05:18 UTC

 

A panel of Japan's science ministry has begun discussing who should run a fast-breeder nuclear reactor in Fukui Prefecture.

The 9-member panel of experts held its 1st meeting on Monday.

Last month, Japan's nuclear regulator called on science minister Hiroshi Hase to replace the operator of the Monju prototype reactor. A series of safety problems have been found at the plant, including failure to inspect thousands of items.

The president of the operator, the Japan Atomic Energy Agency, briefed panel members on what had happened and its report compiled last year on how to reform the plant's operation.

Some members of the panel criticized the Monju operator's report, saying the agency does not seem to be deeply analyzing the problems.

Others said it is also necessary to discuss what to do with the reactor, and how to conduct research and development of a fast-breeder nuclear reactor.

The panel decided to study how the agency is run and conducts its safety management to determine the fundamental causes of the problems.

It also decided to report to Hase in about 6 months the results of its discussions on who should take over the running of the plant from the agency.

 

 

 

Partager cet article

Commenter cet article